Showing posts with label Syria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Syria. Show all posts

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Why the Assad Regime is Still in Power?


     After almost 10 months of unprecedented protests calling for freedom and regime change, Assad's regime still retains its hold on power, in spite of all internal and external pressure. Up to now the only thing that the regime and the protesters have proved is that they are both much stronger than anyone thought.

Anyone can see that when protests reach a critical mass they will be very hard to stop - even the unspeakable Syrian security apparatus backed by the Syrian army has found it really hard to suppress the current momentum of protest unfolding almost everywhere in Syria except in the largest two cities: the capital Damascus and Halab (Aleppo) remain relatively calm with only minor protests happening here and there. The question is WHY should this be so?

There is no doubt that the iron fist of the security forces and the army plays an important role in keeping things quiet in Damascus. Some people argue that as in Libya just before the regime collapsed the people of Damascus will join fellow protesters from outside the capital, but this does not explain the relative quiet in the northern city of Halab. The reason actually has to do with the Syrian middle class which is mostly concentrated in Damascus and Halab. Throughout the past 50 years, the  Syrian education system has been devoted to serving Ba'th Party radical ideology and to profiling both Hafez Assad and his son Bashar after him as demigods. This has created two whole generations who have never seen anything but the Assad family in power. For many people the mere idea of replacing the Assad family amounts to blasphemy, while for many others any change towards democracy appears just too good to be true in a corner of the world that has barely known any kind of democracy or civil rights in the last 4 generations.

A Syrian Woman Chanting for Freedom
The change in the Arab World during the Arab Spring has been led by the middle class which has been severely constrained over the last couple of decades. Though the middle class in Syria didn't gain any fundamental civil rights in Bashar Assad's reign, the young modern leader did create a new atmosphere for trade and opened up the Syrian market enabling entrepreneurs to develop excellent relations with neighboring countries and notably Turkey. This lead to the creation of a new class of wealthy businessmen concentrated mainly in the border city of Halab with many Syrians working for this newly created class and benefiting from the status quo. Even though lacking most its civil and political rights, this new class still prefers the status quo to the prospect of a much more uncertain future. Mass rallies supporting Assad were staged in Damascus and Halab.  Now I am pretty sure that the regime as always is still able to force people to attend such rallies, but I am equally sure that you will find a great number of people among these masses who still believe that Assad is Syria's best option.

What's more, the Syrian revolution never took the shape of a sectarian rebellion by the Sunni majority against the Alawite sect –which the Assad family comes from. Syria may number quite a few sects but the Ba'th party was a totally secular regime in which everyone suffered the same level of oppression. Yet the Syrian regime has waged a successful propaganda campaign against the uprising, which caricatures it as a sectarian movement.  This has driven almost all Alawites away from it, and a similar impact has been achieved in other parts of Syrian society which either fear that the uprising will turn finally turn into civil war or construct the new Syrian regime along  sectarian lines as in Lebanon, or reach a level similar to Iraq which is not much better than Lebanon.
Pro-Assad Mass Rallies in Damascus
Observers should also note that the Russians are totally against any type of UN or NATO involvement in the crisis. Syria is the oldest and the only ally of Russia in the Middle East; if Russia were to lose it, it would lose its only base in one of the world's most important hot zones. A Russian naval fleet has now made its way to Tartous, a major Syrian sea port on the Mediterranean. This sends a very strong signal to Western powers that Russia has no intention of repeating the mistake it made when dealing with the Libyan uprising.A Russian veto looms large for anyone trying to bring the Syrian case before the Security Council.

In my personal opinion, the Syrian people started their own revolution demanding freedom and democracy without the backing of any regional or global power. To date, their uprising has been the longest of all public movements during the Arab Spring and it is not showing any sign of weakening. In 1982 the same Syrian regime massacred 20,-30,000 people in the city of Hama in an operation ostensibly waged against the Muslim Brotherhood and their military wing that had seized control of the city at that time. The regime wanted to set an example for anyone who might think of following Hama's lead. Since there was a complete media blackout –much worse than the one now- the massacre was completed in less than a month. And now the very children of the victims of the Hama massacre are mobilizing to bring down the same tyranny that murdered their parents.  The chances of  this movement cooling down are very small  - too much blood has been spilt in almost every corner of Syria for anyone to have the right to call it off. It is a bone-breaking battle between a brave nation and a relentless tyranny. I only pray that the future will be brighter for this bold generation than it has been for their forebears.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Assad - Israel's Favorite Tyrant


Though Syria and Israel are still officially in a state of war, Israel's borders with Syria are the quietest they have been in the last 40 years. Despite the fact that Syria is backing some Palestinian militias and Hezbollah Lebanese militia, Syria still remains Israel's friendly foe, the devil that everyone in Tel-Aviv knows how to deal with.

Israel has hardly moved since Syrian youth took to the streets in most areas of this key Arab state calling for nothing but “democracy,” “free elections,” “citizen rights” and “modernity” instead of the one-party one-man regime that's been ruling the country for more than 50 years. This attitude on the part of the Israelis may be due to their deep anxieties that the outcome of the Syrian uprising could well be a more radical and more hostile regime which would provide more fertile ground for the anti-Israel military groups that use Syria as a base from which to launch their attacks on the Hebrew state. As one member of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s cabinet put it, “We know Assad. We knew his father. Of course, we’d love to have a democratic Syria as our neighbor. But do I think that’s going to happen? No!”

There are some voices in Israel calling for us to support the uprising in Syria, but Israeli official policy is to remain neutral towards what is happening. This can be explained in various ways one of which is to say that Israel is not interested in showing any kind of support for the uprising because of the damage such support could cause the image of this public movement, and so as not to give Assad an excuse for dealing even more harshly with the protestors by claiming that their movement is supported by the arch enemy Israel.

Israel is still confused about evaluating the situation in Syria. Such confusion shows up in the statements of Israeli officials likeAvigdor Lieberman who asks us to treat the regime in Damascus in the same way that Ghaddafi's regime was treated. This might be attributable to the harsh lesson Israel learned when it supported the Mubarak regime in Egypt and stood against the public revolution that overthrow him later.

But is the Arab spring actually going to benefit Israel? Israel used to pride itself that it was the only democracy in the Middle East, but that is about to change now! So will the policies of the elected governments in the Arab World go along nicely with the Hebrew state?Israeli president Shimon Peres considered the democratic changes in the Arab world as having potentially positive results for Israel, as Israel would then be dealing with "better neighbors", while on the other hand General Amos Gilad, head of the Israeli Defense Ministry’s Diplomatic-Security Bureau said that "The fall of the Syrian regime led by President Bashar al-Assad will cause a devastating crisis for Israel."  This fear is fed by the results of elections in Arab countries like Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt where the Islamists swept into power and now make up the cabinets. The worst of Israeli fears is the creation of a new form of "cooperation" between the countries in which the Islamists have carried the elections which would be closely related to the outcome of the revolution is Syria. General Amos Gilad also said: " Israel will face an Islamic empire in the Middle East, lead by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Jordan and Syria."

In my opinion the main point is that the transformation towards democratic regimes in Arab Middle Eastern countries is not necessarily good news to Israel. The anti-Israel trend among the people of the Arab world is still strong and effective. The people of Syria, Egypt, Tunis, and Libya did not revolt against their regimes because of their regimes attitude to Israel -  they stood up against Tyranny and Autocracy! For Israel the choice is excuriatingly difficult: between a tyrant they know how to talk to and the none too friendly outcome of democratic change in the Arab world!